2025 Stability Conference
Virtual | November 4-6, 2025
Conference Agenda
Check out the draft 2025 Virtual Stability Conference agenda below! Check the agenda for updates as we finalize our schedule.
Quick Links
November 4-6, 2025
Virtual Conference
2025 Stability Speaker Abstracts
Cross-industry Perspectives on the Use of Predictive Stability Modelling for Biologic Drug Products
John Campbell, Associate Director, GSK
Abstract: As the pharmaceutical industry seeks innovative approaches to accelerate drug development and regulatory approval processes, interest in the use of predictive stability for biological drug products has steadily increased. This report explores the findings from surveys and discussions conducted among various pharmaceutical companies within the cross-industry organization BioPhorum. The survey aimed to assess the interest, attitudes, and applications of predictive stability as a replacement or supplement to traditional long-term stability studies. The focus was specifically on biological drugs such as monoclonal antibodies, where predictive stability methods are less established compared to their use for small synthetic molecules. The results reveal the extent to which predictive stability is integrated within the participating companies, including insights on their use in regulatory submissions. This study highlights the potential of predictive stability to streamline development timelines and enhance product quality assessment in this developing field.
Scientific and Regulatory Principles for Establishing and Maintaining a Stability Program through the Clinical Lifecycle of Biological Products
Patricia Cash, Independent Consultant
Abstract: This webinar will cover the regulations related to demonstration of stability of biopharmaceuticals, including an in-depth review of the newly proposed ICH Q1. Biopharmaceuticals are different from small molecules in their size and complexity. Thus, the stability of biopharmaceuticals has traditionally been proven using multiple analytical techniques and real-time data. This webinar will explain why this has been the case, laying the groundwork for the rest of the conference, which will explore alternatives to this traditional approach. The webinar is recommended to ensure that all conference attendees are familiar with the current regulatory expectations and complications around setting expiration dates for clinical biopharmaceutical products. The webinar will be taught using primarily protein-based biopharmaceuticals as examples. However, the strategies can be adapted to a wide variety of molecules. The webinar will distinguish between forced degradation and formal stability studies, as well as phase appropriate requirements traditionally used to establish shelf-life.
Accelerated Stability for Shelf Life of Biologics
Kristina Flavier, Senior Scientist, FreeThink Technologies, Inc.
Abstract: While risk-based predictive stability (RBPS) methodologies such as the accelerated stability assessment program (ASAP) have seen broad application for small molecule shelf life determination over the last decade, there are fewer reported examples with biomolecules. This is in part due to their higher complexity: In addition to chemical degradation and loss of purity, changes in higher-order structure and biological activity can be shelf life-limiting critical quality attributes (CQAs). Accordingly, biologics often show non-linear kinetics for degradation processes. This presentation will show that an isoconversion methodology (focus on time to the failure point) alleviates the need for determination of explicit rate equations. While non-Arrhenius (discontinuous) behavior has been reported as a function of temperature, resulting in claims that high temperatures are unrepresentative of behavior during long-term refrigerated storage, with careful consideration of phase behavior, an appropriate RBPS design space may be chosen such that high-temperature data can successfully be used to predict long-term shelf life. This presentation will discuss temperature-based acceleration of large molecule CQAs, with recent examples of RBPS studies for assessing long-term storage stability of biologics.
Stability Data in Submissions: Case Studies And Musings of a Recently Retired FDA Reviewer
Chana Fuchs, Retired FDA
Abstract: Stability studies are used to support products claims in regulatory submissions throughout the product lifecycle including INDs, BLAs, and sBLA supplements. Stability data are needed for supporting various parameters such as shelf life/expiration dating, comparability, and instructions for product administration. This talk will address regulator expectations and present case studies encountered during review of stability studies.
Establishing and Maintaining a Stability Lifecycle Program for Commercial Products
Kim HuynhBa, Managing Director, Pharmalytik Consulting
Abstract: Stability lifecycle management is a cornerstone of product quality for biopharmaceuticals, where the complexity and sensitivity of biologic modalities demand a tailored, risk-based approach. Unlike small molecules, biologics are prone to physical and chemical degradation mechanisms such as aggregation, deamidation, and oxidation, all of which can impact safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity. This presentation explores how a robust stability strategy — grounded in real-time data, method performance, and regulatory compliance — is critical to ensuring reliable shelf-life and global supply continuity for commercial products. We will walk through the key stages of the stability lifecycle from development through commercialization, and we will also discuss how digital tools like AI, predictive modeling, and advanced data analytics can possibly shape the future of stability programs.
Contributing Author:
Kim Huynh-Ba, MS, PMP, FAAPS, Managing Director, Pharmalytik; Adjunct Professor, Regulatory Compliance, Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT); Council of Experts, US Pharmacopeia (USP); Fellow, American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS).
Case Studies: Use of Predictive Data to Support Real-Time Stability
Andrew Lennard, External Engagement & Advocacy, Amgen Ltd.
Abstract:
Setting a shelf-life for medicinal products can be on the critical path for the CMC package required for the approval of new, innovative or improved medicines and thereby can delay the availability of these products to the patients that need them. Predictive stability models are seen as a solution for some drugs to optimise product development, for which there are many possible applications throughout development.
Many types of stability model for synthetic chemical entities and biologics are being developed for prediction of attribute levels past the point of available stability data at the recommended storage conditions. Models being considered for biological medicinal product application, include those based on product-specific stability data using linear regression analysis, or complex derivatives of the Arrhenius equation, whereas other models are based on prior knowledge that can include use of Bayesian statistics or machine learning algorithms. Meanwhile, the ICH Stability guidelines are under revision, and the publicly available draft version includes principles and best practices for the use of stability models as part of the modernisation of the stability regulatory environment.
This presentation aims to use case studies that provide an overview for the development of predictive stability models across the biopharmaceutical industry and the current limitations to their use compared to the anticipated future state. Included will be lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and Regulator experience in managing predictive stability models used to extend product shelf-life.
How to Calculate Your Product Shelf Life and Derive Internal Release Limits? Alternative to ICH Q1E.
Perceval Sondag, Head of Nonclinical Biostatistics, Sanofi
Abstract: TBA
Best Practices for Design of Stability Studies for Biotechnology Product Development and Lifecycle Management
Julie Zhang, Principal Scientist Team Lead, United States Pharmacopeia
Abstract: The proposed USP general chapter <1049.1> Design of Stability Studies for Biotechnology Product Development and Lifecycle Management, provides a comprehensive framework for designing stability studies throughout the life cycle of biotechnological and biological products. As a companion to chapter <1049.1> Quality of Biotechnological Product: Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products, this chapter addresses the complexity of biologics and the critical role of stability in ensuring product quality, safety, and efficacy. It outlines best practices for developing a robust stability strategy, including considerations for drug substances, drug products, and combination products. The chapter emphasizes the importance of real-time, accelerated, and stress condition studies, and introduces concepts such as temperature cycling, in-use stability, and the stability budget. It also provides guidance on container closure systems, sample orientation, and statistical modeling for shelf-life estimation. Designed to align with ICH and FDA guidelines, <1049.1> supports regulatory compliance while enabling science- and risk-based decision-making. This presentation will highlight key elements of the chapter, including study design across development phases, post-approval change management, and ongoing stability programs. Attendees will gain insights into how to implement a holistic, life cycle–based approach to stability that supports global regulatory expectations and ensures consistent product performance from development through commercialization.
2025 Planning Committee
Marla Abodeely
Sanofi
Kevin Brooks
K.R. Brooks Associates
Patricia Cash
Independent Consultant
Siân Estdale
ACM Global Laboratories
Laureen Little
BEBPA
Ken Miller
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
Nadine Ritter
Global Biotech Experts